If you love makeup as much as I do, you will probably have heard of the legendary MAC Coco pigment. It was released once as a limited edition shade in May 2005 (that's five whopping years ago!), promptly sold out, and was never released again. Right now, if you can find any, it goes for handsome amounts on Ebay and other scalper sites. It was hailed as the perfect complex taupey neutral, that looks good on almost every skintone. And it's runaway popularity and success was all the more impressive because it happened in the days when beauty blogging was still wearing pampers, so there weren't any bloggers to toot its horn and post photos (there were online forums, though).
Anyway, awhile back, I managed to get my hands on a small sample of the notorious Coco pigment. And while I cradled my precious in my hands, I couldn't help buy notice one thing: beautiful as it was (hello complex taupe!), it looked familiar. Eerily familiar. Like, don't-I-already-have-a-similar-colour-in-my-stash familiar.
Excited at this awesome possibility that Coco pigment might have a dupe, I went to my stash to dig out all my eyeshadows, and found the potential dupe - the humble and totally underrated Urban Decay eyeshadow in YDK.
Here they are in their containers. Similar, no?
L-R: Mac Coco Pigment (in sample jar), Urban Decay YDK
But of course, the million-dollar question is, how are they swatched? So here you go:
L-R: Urban Decay YDK, Mac Coco
There you go! I do think they are dupes, or at least on my skin they are. I think one might be a tad browner than the other, but I honestly think that if you already have YDK, and you pay insane amounts for MAC's Coco, you're going to be disappointed that you paid for something you already have a dupe for.
On me, they're virtually identical. It may vary on other people, as to some extent what passes for a dupe is partly dependent on your skintone. Not so much for nail polish, but more so for makeup products. Still, I think UD's (Urban Decay) YDK is going to satisfy a lot of lemmings for MAC's Coco.
Which might make some of us wonder - if MAC's Coco pigment was all that and a bag of chips, why isn't UD's YDK taking over the world and being sold out at Sephoras and other makeup stores all across the world? It could be that MAC has that hardcore fanatic fanbase that makes every LE item a must-have while UD doesn't, or it could be that Coco was such a long time ago that people forget they ever wanted it and have moved on to other things. I guess this just shows that some makeup products are just totally underrated. And UD YDK is one of them.
Anyway, to sum up my post - both colours are TEH AWESOMEZ, like SRSLY. LOL. No seriously - it's hard to fine such a complex taupe. It's taupe, sure but they have hints of other colours - bronze, plum, champagne, purple, brown - that make it so unique, and so universally flattering. And also, that if you missed the boat on Coco pigment, you can still catch the YDK one.
How to dry your hair, according to science
2 weeks ago
Don't thake this the wrong way because I love finsing dupes of LE stuff as much as the next addict....Are you SURE that isn't MAC Coco Beach pigment? Mac Coco is much cooler and has no bronzey attributes like the one you have in the photograph.
ReplyDeletePerhaps it is my monitor settings.
The two colors you swatched look identical to me :>
ReplyDeleteiono one looks darker or maybe its the comp ♥
ReplyDeleteThey look the same to me whether anyone else agrees or not. I'm glad you showed this because I would've passed up YDK before this but it's a gorgeous shade. Thanks! :3
ReplyDeleteThey look the same to me! I guess that's good news, then--because I have YDK and love it! :)
ReplyDeleteI think with YDK it's a wee bit darker and brownish, but definitely great to have if one doesn't have Coco
ReplyDeleteI know I'm late to the party, but I have to agree with Elvira. Mac Coco is far cooler . . .
ReplyDelete